[Noisebridge-discuss] Community, FTP, & Problem Solving
nejucomo at gmail.com
Fri Jun 28 01:27:00 UTC 2013
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 5:49 PM, rachel lyra hospodar
<rachelyra at gmail.com>wrote:
> Thank you for caring! I got really sad about someone else's offhanded
> comment that if we do any realtime meetups around harrassment issues, there
> is no use because the people who need them won't be there...
> Which is to say, that person believed that harassment is only the problem
> of skeevy creepers, and those they creep on.
Um... /me scratches head. I wonder why they believe that. Anyway, I
disagree and I'm still interested in a specialized list/group/event.
> I believe it's helpful for anyone who wants to demonstrate that they
> retain some humanity to engage with the issue. I also believe that anyone
> who is interested in the problem is qualified to engage with it, and in
> fact the entire thrust of hackering is that you don't need anyone's
> permission, or to reach an educational benchmark, to begin working.
I just realized this thread may have drifted from Garrett's initial intent,
which may have been more about "what policies should nb adopt now to solve
urgent social problems such as people sleeping or cooking."
I'm imagining something distinct but complementary to the "rebase /
runlevel 6" movement which I see as more specific, short term, and
concrete. By contrast, I believe what we are discussing here is more like
an ongoing discussion group about social change within noise bridge.
Does that distinction make sense? Nuts and bolts versus skills and theory?
I'm thinking more along the lines of discussion groups, workshops,
show-and-tell for topics like conflict resolution methodologies, mediation
techniques, communication skills, therapeutic techniques, safe-space
facilitation, consensus lessons learned talks, etc...
> On Jun 27, 2013 8:09 PM, "Nathan" <nejucomo at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I forgot my footnote!
>>  I was specifically "inspired to care" by this train wreck of a
>> thread, in particular the private email Lillian is responding to here:
>> On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Nathan <nejucomo at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I'm interested in this topic, but I ignore most of discuss. If there's
>>> a new list / venue / group forming, I'd appreciate an invitation. "human
>>> problems" is quite broad, and I welcome the broadness of the term.
>>> I have an interest in learning about therapy, mediation, psychology,
>>> "human communication tech", but not much background in these areas.
>>> Another interest I have is more specific to safe spaces, feminism, rape
>>> culture, sexual abuse denial, and "anti feminazi" sentiment , especially
>>> in radically open consensual contexts.
>>> On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Adrian Chadd <adrian.chadd at gmail.com>wrote:
>>>> On 27 June 2013 15:02, Praveen Sinha <dmhomee at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> > I tried pulling in a several therapists, and actually contacted a
>>>> > psychologist collective in the east bay to see if they would work
>>>> with us,
>>>> > but no luck :( I agree and still think it's a great idea -- do you
>>>> > anyone in your networks to recruit?
>>>> I don't have any contacts here like that, sorry. I've only been in
>>>> town ~ 18 months.
>>>> Are there therapist associations or psychology associations that you
>>>> can ask for guidance? What about the psychology departments at various
>>>> universities here?
>>>> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
>>>> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
>> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
>> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Noisebridge-discuss