[Noisebridge-discuss] Get the F Out!
martinbogo at gmail.com
Thu Mar 14 19:32:51 UTC 2013
Leaving this link here. http://www.debunking911.com/firsttime.htm
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Jake <jake at spaz.org> wrote:
> large and barely controlled fires - those have happened in skyscrapers
> around the world and NEVER resulted in even a partial collapse. But you
> said "more plausible," so i guess i can't argue with that.
> don't forget that the fires in towers 1 and 2 burned for only for about an
> hour, and building 7 burned for maybe 8 hours but kindof a small pathetic
> these were some big skyscraper fires (no collapses though):
> One Meridian Plaza is a 38-floor skyscraper in Philadelphia that suffered
> a severe fire on February 23, 1991. The fire started on the 22nd floor
> and raged for 18 hours, gutting eight floors and causing an estimated
> $100 million in direct property loss. 1 2 3 It was later described
> by Philadelphia officials as "the most significant fire in this century".
> The fire caused window breakage, cracking of granite, and failures of
> spandrel panel connections. 4 Despite the severity and duration of the
> fire, as evidenced by the damage the building sustained, no part of the
> building collapsed.
> Gopiballava Flaherty wrote:
> On Mar 14, 2013, at 11:31 AM, Jake <jake at spaz.org> wrote:
>> hopefully nobody on this list thinks that three steel skyscraper can just
>> all collapse into their own footprints, because two of them were hit with
> I think that what you describe would be unlikely, yes.
> However, large and barely controlled fires followed by collapses that went
> outside the buildings footprints - which is a more accurate description of
> 9/11 - are somewhat more plausible.
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
More information about the Noisebridge-discuss