[Noisebridge-discuss] door "security": culture, not policy.
pnaomi at gmail.com
Sat Mar 23 05:49:35 UTC 2013
This discussion on the cultural ramifications of self-surveillance is a
stub. You can help Noisebridge by expanding it.
--a very tired Naomi going to bed now.
On Friday, March 22, 2013, Garrett Mace wrote:
> You're in a better position than I am to identify and list those problems.
> What are they, other than changing NB culture (which according to many on
> this mailing list is due for a change) or having to consensificate?
> Video surveillance replaces one set of problems with a different set of
> This course of action would significantly change NB culture and should be
> consensed upon.
> On Friday, March 22, 2013, Gopiballava Flaherty wrote:
>> On Mar 22, 2013, at 20:58, Garrett Mace <garrettmace at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Video surveillance in the space.
>> How about something that caches a certain duration of video, and deletes
>> it unless somebody presses the "something got stolen" button? That's sort
>> of what happened to Steve Mann. His wearable's auto erase functionality was
>> disabled due to some issues when he was assaulted:
>> (Apparently not the first time - he got hit by a car in a hit and run,
>> and the car damaged his wearable when it knocked him over...)
>> Could also set up some sort of cryptographic system that only specific
>> people could use to access the video, including automatic posting on the
>> mailing list that video of a specific timeframe was going to be viewed.
>> Extract images of the perpetrator, publish those, and destroy the video.
>> gopi at iPad
> Naomi Theora Most
> skype: nthmost
Naomi Theora Most
naomi at nthmost.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Noisebridge-discuss