[Noisebridge-discuss] membership application endorsement signature for rhodey by jake
lee at lee.org
Fri Nov 1 05:16:53 UTC 2013
>don't forget that as soon as a person gathers _two_ signatures they are
entitled to be in the space alone.
I didn't see that part in the Membership
but that totally makes sense. When someone is up for regular membership,
it's kinda obvious that they have to be allowed in the space so they can
show their excellence. That isn't in the rules because, well, this access
restriction thing is all new, right?
So am I correct in thinking I could walk into the space right now, shout,
"Hey, would 4 people sign my Associate Membership form?" and potentially be
Associate-Membershipified within SECONDS?
<snark> That's way too hard. NB should be
rebooted/destroyed/mercury-tabled instead of implementing this. </snark>
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 8:24 PM, Jake <jake at spaz.org> wrote:
> I read the consensed proposal, found at:
> and it says that consensus is _not_ required for a person to become an
> associate member. So while it will be nice to read off their names at
> meetings, i think that once a person gathers signatures of four Members,
> they instantly become an Associate Member.
> don't forget that as soon as a person gathers _two_ signatures they are
> entitled to be in the space alone. Getting four signatures means they can
> sponsor other people.
> that's my interpretation of it. Also, now that i read what was exactly
> consensed on i think it needs a lot of clarification because it really is
> worded pretty harshly. I would rather it say something like "Persons who
> are not members, associate members, or guests of same may be asked to leave
> at any time if they cannot find a member to sponsor their presence."
> On Thu, 31 Oct 2013, Lee Sonko wrote:
> >Four signatures and you automatically become an associate member!
>> I don't believe that is how the proposal reads. I would have guessed that
>> Associate Members names still have to be read at 4 meetings. Am I correct?
>> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Jake <jake at spaz.org> wrote:
>> rhodey there is no need to wait for a meeting unless you are going
>> for full membership, which i encourage you to do.
>> right now you should fill out an application, put references on it
>> to the signatures by me and alexglow on your wiki user page, and consider
>> yourself "allowed" in
>> the space.
>> Four signatures and you automatically become an associate member!
>> On Thu, 31 Oct 2013, rhodey wrote:
>> Thank you Jake and Merlin for your endorsements :) I will
>> have an application ready for next weeks meeting.
>> Having already left noisebridge discuss due to-- clog of
>> signal, I agree that we should work out a better system for doing this
>> remotely. Maybe
>> endorsements could be placed on the members wiki profile page?
>> -- rhodey
>> On 10/31/13 14:05, Alexandra Glowaski wrote:
>> Oh! Me too! I will endorse the shit out of Rhodey.
>> Though I don't think this method should be general-use
>> -- clogging the
>> signal and all that
>> Any recommended alternatives for remote people? I got
>> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 1:14 PM, Jake <jake at spaz.org
>> <mailto:jake at spaz.org>> wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>> i jake as a noisebridge member hereby endorse
>> rhodey in his
>> application for membership at noisebridge
>> rhodey, put the subject of this message on your
>> application in
>> quotes and write Google this text: "membership
>> endorsement signature for rhodey by jake"
>> - -jake
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Version: GnuPG v2.0.21 (FreeBSD)
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
>> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.__no**isebridge.net<http://noisebridge.net>
>> <mailto:Noisebridge-discuss@**lists.noisebridge.net<Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net>
>> Make your world! • http://alexglow.com
>> VSRE emails are cool. • http://vsre.info/
>> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
>> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.**noisebridge.net<Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Noisebridge-discuss