[Noisebridge-discuss] Romy applying to become associate member
romy at snowyla.com
Sat Nov 2 17:02:49 UTC 2013
Thanks! I enjoy the transparency of this associate membership process.
I will resend my message to Elizabeth although if she is on the list she has probably seen it. It is not good to be torn up!
Sent from my iPhone
> On Nov 1, 2013, at 10:56 AM, LinkReincarnate <linkreincarnate at gmail.com> wrote:
> In that case if you don't have enough sponsors I will also sponser you. I don't have a fancy non-deniable tamper-proof identity proving electronic signature (I'd like one) so this post will have to suffice.
> Also Elizabeth is who you should send apologies to. She is still pretty upset about the who situation.
>> On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 7:34 AM, Romy Snowyla <romy at snowyla.com> wrote:
>> Oh link reincarnate I take your constructive criticism and use it to better myself. I was wrong to criticize the trolles and I will work to improveme myself. By criticizing the trolles I misunderstood the noisebridge mission and now corrected by the community I change my approach. I promise not to criticize trolles and change my behavior going forward. So be it
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>> On Oct 31, 2013, at 10:12 AM, LinkReincarnate <linkreincarnate at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I'm not sure you understand what Noisebridge is about. We are here to work on projects and learn. Therefore it is not excellent to discourage people from participating in projects. What you said on Elizabeth's thread about the Trolles (which is actually being written to make content for the Noisebridge radio project) is an example of why I think you need to rethink your approach to Noisebridge. If you must object to a project (for ethical reasons) you should at least state why. Critical posts with no constructive feedback, substantive content, or clear rebuttals are not needed. It's not what Noisebridge is about.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Noisebridge-discuss