[Noisebridge-discuss] Information needed for our LPFM filing.

Norman Bradley pryankster at gmail.com
Mon Nov 4 06:47:02 UTC 2013


The norman at ix.netcom.comis probably the safest. Thanks.

You are entitled to your own opinion.
You are NOT entitled to your own facts.

Norman

On 11/3/2013 10:16 PM, Alexandra Glowaski wrote:
> Heya! I've been out traveling, with no wifi and a phone on the fritz. 
> I'll be happy to send you my info privately; while it may well become 
> public as soon as anybody requests to see the document, I'd rather 
> keep it off-list.
>
> cheers,
> merlin.
>
> On Saturday, November 2, 2013, Noisebridge Radio 
> <noisebridgeradio at gmail.com <mailto:noisebridgeradio at gmail.com>> wrote:
> > Today is November Second and the filing deadline is the morning of 
> the Fourteenth. I still haven't heard from any of the Officers or 
> Board Members. If any are nervious about Google reading your mail,bh 
> understandable, please use my private email norman at ix.netcom.com 
> <mailto:norman at ix.netcom.com>
> > If the lack of responses is so the project will die please show the 
> people that have worked on this project some respect and state so. 
> Keep in mind that unless all of the parties respond I won't file for 
> the license. I just don't like the idea of lying to the federal 
> government.
> > I have appended the original note.
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 8:43 AM, Noisebridge Radio 
> <noisebridgeradio at gmail.com <mailto:noisebridgeradio at gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> > There seems that there is concern that I may be doing something 
> nefarious and secret so here is the information needed and why. I need 
> the information ASAP so I can submit our application. These are from 
> FCC Form 318. [http://transition.fcc.gov/Forms/Form318/318.pdf]
> > The, legal name, residence address, citizenship, and position, of 
> the board members and officers (#3 below). I need the answers to the 
> questions listed below. I don't need details for 6 through 9 and only 
> need information for #5 if the answer is no. Some of these answers are 
> a bit touchy so please respond privately to this address or find me at 
> the Tuesday meeting. All answers except #3 will be kept confidential. 
> #3 needs to go on the form when submitted.
> > 3. Parties to the Application.
> >      a. List separately each party to the application including, as 
> applicable, the applicant, its officers, directors, five percent or 
> greater stockholders, non-insulated partners, members, and all other 
> persons and entities with attributable interests. If a corporation or 
> partnership holds an attributable interest in the applicant, list 
> separately, as applicable, its officers, directors, five percent or 
> greater stockholders, non-insulated partners, and board members. 
> Create a separate row for each individual or entity. Attach additional 
> pages if necessary.
> > 5. Ownership.
> >      a. Applicant certifies that it and all parties to the 
> application comply with the multiple ownership limits set forth in 
> Section 73.855 of the Commission's rules. See 47 C.F.R. Section 
> 73.855. 
> [http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2003-title47-vol4/pdf/CFR-2003-title47-vol4-sec73-858.pdf]
> >      b. Applicant certifies that it and all parties to the 
> application comply with the cross-ownership limits set forth in 
> Section 73.860 of the Commission's rules. See 47 C.F.R. Section 
> 73.860. 
> [http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2012-title47-vol4/pdf/CFR-2012-title47-vol4-sec73-860.pdf]
> >      c. Applicant certifies that it and all parties to the 
> application comply with the Commission's policies relating to media 
> interests of immediate family members; and
> >      d. Applicant certifies that it and all parties to the 
> application comply with the Commission's policies relating to investor 
> insulation and the non-participation of non-party investors or creditors.
> > 6. Character Issues. The applicant certifies that neither the 
> applicant nor any party to the application has or has had any interest 
> in, or connection with:
> >      a. any broadcast application in any proceeding where character 
> issues were left unresolved or were resolved adversely against the 
> applicant or party to the application; or
> >      b. any pending broadcast application in which character issues 
> have been raised. Adverse Findings. The applicant certifies that no 
> adverse finding has been made and no adverse final action has been 
> taken by any court or administrative body as to the applicant, any 
> party to this application, or any non-party equity owner in the 
> applicant, in a civil or criminal proceeding brought under the 
> provisions of any law related to the following: any felony; mass media 
> related antitrust or unfair competition; fraudulent statements to 
> another governmental unit; or discrimination?
> > 8. Unlicensed Operation. The applicant certifies, under penalty of 
> perjury, that neither the applicant nor any party to the application 
> has engaged in any manner, individually or with other persons, groups, 
> organizations, or other entities, in the unlicensed operation of any 
> station in violation of Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, 
> as amended, 47 U.S.C. Section 301. 
> [http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCODE-2011-title47/pdf/USCODE-2011-title47-chap5-subchapIII-partI-sec301.pdf]
> > 9. Anti-Drug Abuse Act Certification. Applicant certifies that 
> neither the applicant nor any party to the application is subject to 
> denial of federal benefits pursuant to Section 5301 of the Anti-Drug 
> Abuse Act of 1988, 21 U.S.C. Sectivgfv
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/attachments/20131103/b5ae211a/attachment.html>


More information about the Noisebridge-discuss mailing list