[Noisebridge-discuss] Meeting Notes 2013 11 12 - slightly abridged
neurofog at gmail.com
Thu Nov 14 00:47:53 UTC 2013
As I understand it, NB has a tradition of pseudonymous membership. Has that
changed with the Wiki Membership proposal?
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 4:37 PM, Lee Sonko <lee at lee.org> wrote:
> It seems extreme to force all members to publicly identify themselves on
> the public wiki. Is there a problem with using the membership binder in the
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 2:05 PM, jarrod hicks <hicksu at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hello ya'll. Here are the highlights from last nights meeting.
>> A. Folks are putting together a new hackerspace in SF. Join us on
>> #sfhackerspace on Freenode.
>> B. Alex Gudkov has just signed a lease on a 3500 sq ft space at Mission &
>> 6th, perhaps for use hacking, or as a coop. Get in touch!
>> Consensus proposals from last week:
>> A. We discussed JC's proposal to secure the space. We agreed the
>> "It should be possible to secure Noisebridge when not in use. Noisebridge
>> should be secured when not in use. All Noisebridge Members and Associate
>> Members should have access to Noisebridge."
>> We decided to form a cabal to work on the details, and actually build
>> this. We noted that we haven't decided to spend money on this, just agreed
>> on the principle.
>> B. We discussed Tom's proposal to make the list of members public. We
>> agreed the following:
>> "It shall not a secret whether a person is Member of Noisebridge. It
>> shall be the responsibility of each member to identify themself as a member
>> by adding the Category:Members to their wiki user page. Until a Member so
>> identifies, they shall not be entitled to any privilege of Noisebridge
>> Membership. Likewise, if a member is on Membership/Hiatus, they must
>> indicate this by adding the Category:Hiatus to their wiki user page; this
>> method of so identifying shall replace any other notification requirement
>> for going on and coming off hiatus. Although it shall generally be a
>> responsibility shared by all members to ensure that this category of
>> identification is used correctly, in cases where its use is disputed,
>> Noisebridge's secretary shall be the final arbiter."
>> Consensus Proposals for next week
>> A. "As a result of our prior conversation, we collectively propose: If a
>> member has not identified themself as such by adding the Category:Members
>> to their wiki user page by $DATE, they shall no longer be a member of
>> B. Tom proposes that:
>> "If a paper membership application has been in the binder for more than
>> twelve weeks, that application should be discarded. If that person still
>> wants to become a member, they must start the application process over from
>> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
>> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Noisebridge-discuss