[Noisebridge-discuss] anti-anonymity proposals
c1 at caseyc.net
Fri Nov 15 04:10:34 UTC 2013
On 11/14/13 12:24 PM, jim wrote:
> It seems to
> me that we now have a small cabal that is
> trying to address problems by fiat rather
> than ad hoc with sympathy and analysis and
Without commenting on anything else you've said, I'd like to object
to this particular assertion. All the decisions being made have been
month-long consensus items, documented in meeting notes as usual and
discussed extensively on the mailing list. If there's a secret cabal,
they aren't doing a very good job of hiding themselves.
I know NB meetings have always been boring slog-fests at the best of
times, and I haven't seen a keysigning in quite a while. However, I
don't think it's fair to allege fiat.
p.s. I went to the space to do some hacking a week ago and the
environment was pretty great. Lots of actual hackifying going on. It
felt the closest to the NB I remember of 3 years ago. I'm not naïve
enough, however, to assume the ends justify the means.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 727 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the Noisebridge-discuss