[Noisebridge-discuss] anti-anonymity proposals

jim jim at systemateka.com
Sat Nov 16 06:40:35 UTC 2013


    That may be the case for you; not for me. I 
stand by my claim that Ceren's email was 
antagonistic and insulting. 

    I stand by my dislike that anyone would turn 
too quickly to the community for formal support. 
    My meaning is that anyone should try, at 
least, to deal with things with one's self and 
one's friends and to apply to people in the 
vicinity to help deal. That seems healthy and 
potentially strengthening. 
    That's my point of view and I do not see how 
it's insulting or unsupportive. 
    If you disagree, fine. 

    You haven't answered my question whether you 
are trolling me. 




On Fri, 2013-11-15 at 22:22 -0800, Snail wrote:
> No one is fooled, Jim. We're all pretty sure this wasn't Ceren who
> instigated a slew of e-mails saying that JIM's ideas have, to be
> polite, slipped the surly bonds of earth. You yourself can only be
> blamed for the responses against you, and you're just making yourself
> look worse for lashing out at this person like they are to blame for
> things you wrote yourself.
> 
> Anyway, we're all pretty sure here that the unpleasant turn - or
> lulzical dance - actually began with
> 
> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 11:13 AM, jim <jim at systemateka.com> wrote:
> >             As to females being harassed, for cases of
> >         crude coppings of feels, I dislike taht female
> >         turning to the community for support
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> -Snailssnailssnailssnailssnailssnailssnails
> ............. _ at y
> http://obamaischeckingyouremail.tumblr.com/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss




More information about the Noisebridge-discuss mailing list