[Noisebridge-discuss] proposal for noisebridge membership changes

jim jim at systemateka.com
Wed Oct 2 18:31:50 UTC 2013

Maybe we should revisit the concept of 
being excellent to each other. 

On Wed, 2013-10-02 at 11:18 -0700, spinach williams wrote:
> On Oct 2, 2013 11:01 AM, "jim" <jim at systemateka.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > ???
> >     My proposal is to keep things as they have been,
> > not institute new policies that seem to me to have
> > unpleasant affects.
> >     I think we each should deal with problems as they
> > occur and ask each other for help when we feel help
> > is needed.
> >     I like minimizing the number of official pleas
> > for help at the Tuesday night meetings.
> >     Oh yeah, I believe Jake's well-intended proposal
> > is probably unworkable because of the
> > enforcement-surveillance aspect.
> also, i must ask who gets to define theft? some weeks back, the
> possessions of a very frequent, outgoing, welcome and welcoming
> visitor to the space had been taken and thrown out. the letter of the
> law would define that act as a theft, however the members in the space
> considered it cleanup and have defended the act. for the most part i
> share in this nontolerance of theft and most people would agree,
> however i come to doubt we're all working from an agreed upon
> definition of theft.

More information about the Noisebridge-discuss mailing list