[Noisebridge-discuss] Job Creator
romy at snowyla.com
Fri Oct 18 04:04:26 UTC 2013
While I wouldn't want to discourage anyone or give the impression I'm controlling the mailing list, I notice a pattern of Noisebridge members getting caught up in very long threads involving semantics.
This happened at sudoroom a lot too when I hung out there.
I'm on the fence of whether this is bad or not: smart people love to argue but it feels like most Noisebridge members are pretty feminist and on the same side. Compared to other hacker spaces it's pretty woman friendly to me
Is it necessary to argue for 48 hours non stop on semantics? Maybe. But I could see such issues being potentially divisive.
If I were a hostile outsider i would definitely troll this list to create an argument like this that would divide allies over fine semantics
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 16, 2013, at 10:16 AM, Nicholas LoCicero <nick.locicero at gmail.com> wrote:
> I dont think johnny meant anything by it. Youre judging his words without hearing his subtext. Yes, I get upset when people say 'thats gay' because Im queer spawn, but i have never corrected anyone on it because I knew they werent really serious, just ignorant and ignorance is suffering, so reacting to ignorance is reacting tp suffering.
>> On Oct 16, 2013 10:07 AM, "Jeffrey Carl Faden" <jeffreyatw at gmail.com> wrote:
>> "Sexual language and imagery should be only be used for positive purposes in accordance with best practices advocated by professional sex educators (if you’re not sure what those are, don’t do it)."
>>> On Oct 16, 2013, at 10:05 AM, Johny Radio <johnyradio at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
>> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Noisebridge-discuss