[Noisebridge-discuss] amendments to membership proposal - associate members and 24/7 hours

jim jim at systemateka.com
Sun Oct 27 16:13:47 UTC 2013



    Having an automated something or another 
as a signal at 11 PM might help relieve the 
sting of requiring "papers" at the bell ring 
(or flashing LEDs or whatever). 





On Sat, 2013-10-26 at 21:17 -0700, Dan Cote wrote:
> I'm not talking about the individual who is being asked. In this case,
> it is the act of walking around the space asking for papers and
> surprising our guests with requests to leave at certain times of day.
> 
> 
> Ideally, we can find a way to have a member greet every new guest, and
> possibly welcome them to the space informing them that they are a
> guest of that member until the member leaves, or some such system to
> be determined. The point is to inform guests of whatever process is
> happening at the door as they arrive. If you read the first post in
> the thread, you may get a better idea of what was intended to happen.
> 
> 
> On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 8:29 PM, davidfine <d at vidfine.com> wrote:
>         If we ask a person to leave at 11pm and that causes a severe
>         conflict, that person has identified themselves as someone who
>         is taking advantage. If you're not a member and you can't find
>         a member to vouch for you, come back in the morning. 
>         --D
>         
>         
>         On 10/26/13, 3:28 AM, Dan Cote wrote:
>         
>         > It hasn't been working. It causes conflict with everybody,
>         > not just people that are taking advantage. The conflicts are
>         > severe and affect everyone. It would be better to handle
>         > these issues at the door when guests arrive.
>         > 
>         > 
>         > On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 2:09 AM, davidfine <d at vidfine.com>
>         > wrote:
>         >         I think the 11pm roundup should continue. If it
>         >         causes conflict with people who are taking
>         >         advantage, that's a good thing. At least the
>         >         conflict will come on our terms, when we're prepared
>         >         for it. There is no way to solve these issues
>         >         without conflict. 
>         >         --D 
>         >         
>         >         
>         >         On 10/24/13, 11:28 PM, Dan Cote wrote:
>         >         
>         >         > Can we agree to stop the 11pm inquisition ritual
>         >         > right now? Maybe we can figure out how to solve
>         >         > these issues in a better way.
>         >         > 
>         >         > 
>         >         > On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 1:47 PM, jim
>         >         > <jim at well.com> wrote:
>         >         >         
>         >         >             I like that a lot! Good definition,
>         >         >         nice
>         >         >         and circular, leaves open what does it
>         >         >         mean
>         >         >         to hack (a good thing).
>         >         >         
>         >         >         
>         
>         
>         
>         _______________________________________________
>         Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
>         Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
>         https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>         
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss




More information about the Noisebridge-discuss mailing list