[Noisebridge-discuss] The legalities.

Henner Zeller h.zeller at acm.org
Fri Apr 4 04:07:35 UTC 2014


+1

On 3 April 2014 20:52, Norman Bradley <pryankster at gmail.com> wrote:
> It has been mentioned several times that people living at NB violates our
> lease. It is actually a bit more complicated. After looking up how 2169
> Mission is zoned. I found that it is not zoned for residential. A place to
> start looking is at
> http://www.sf-planning.org/index.aspx?page=2771#findzoning . That is the San
> Francisco Planning Department and you can find a list of changes, permits,
> and even how much things cost. Our place "Appears eligible for listing in
> the California Register of Historical Resources."
>
> I am NOT a lawyer so this is just a guess after looking at the online
> records. I think that what they say is that floor 1 is zoned for food sales
> and floors 2 and 3 are light industrial. To allow sleeping / living in the
> space will at least require new permits from the, Planning Dept., Fire
> Dept., and Health Dept. as well as convincing the landlord.
>
> I'm not sure how long flogging this issue will continue, but, in my opinion
> it is not up for debate. It is spelled out in both zoning law and our lease.
> Our object should be how do we stop it not how much should we allow.
>
> You are entitled to your own opinion.
> You are NOT entitled to your own facts.
>
> Norman
>
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss


More information about the Noisebridge-discuss mailing list