[Noisebridge-discuss] better tech for making decisions
daravinne at gmail.com
Sat Apr 5 00:48:21 UTC 2014
Community working group is meant to be the umbrella group, please merge
those two pages
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Naomi Most <pnaomi at gmail.com> wrote:
> Good points!
> On that note, what do you think of this:
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 2:21 PM, Xavier Aubuchon-Mendoza
> <xavieram at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I'm not implying a lack of faith in the community, just an awareness of
> > different tools shape behavior.
> > My whole intent was to encourage the inclusion of some failure state into
> > the process - that is, if it doesn't work and makes things worse, it can
> > turned off and worked on, and it doesn't hijack the whole system.
> > I believe in assuming the best about people... and having a backup plan.
> > That's all.
> > -Xavier
> > On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Naomi Most <pnaomi at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Well, I am trying to put faith in the community to be more like a
> >> community and less like an "Us versus Them" situation.
> >> I don't want to design solutions predicated on the existing problems.
> >> I want to design solutions that assume the best about the potential of
> >> the humans of Noisebridge while keeping the lessons of the past in
> >> mind.
> >> To put it metaphorically:
> >> If you're looking for a good place to sit, don't add lumbar support to
> >> a table. Design a chair.
> >> --Naomi
> Naomi Theora Most
> naomi at nthmost.com
> skype: nthmost
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Noisebridge-discuss