[Noisebridge-discuss] Noisebridge Bylaws

Naomi Gmail pnaomi at gmail.com
Mon Apr 7 01:15:26 UTC 2014


Good constructive question.

If we can't agree on the bylaws as a firm basis, then we have no foundation at all, and nothing we do in writing or at meetings will help to bring this disparate community together. 

I am not for changing the bylaws, at all.  Don't see any need to. 

Of possible relevance: 

In proposing a rewrite -- or better stated, a "renewal"-- of a Mission Statement, it wasn't my intention to imply a rewrite to the bylaws. Only a rewriting (or not!) of what appears on the wiki as the explanation of what Noisebridge "does" and why, and more importantly, a process of coming to the agreement that helps the community understand itself better. 

--Naomi


> On Apr 6, 2014, at 4:47 PM, Al Sweigart <asweigart at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> So, I'm of the mindset that the Noisebridge bylaws are not suggestions, but rules that cannot be ignored or are somehow optional. Anyone else like to make a public record if they feel the same way or the opposite?
> 
> -Al
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss


More information about the Noisebridge-discuss mailing list