[Noisebridge-discuss] History of my member page on the wiki

Al Sweigart asweigart at gmail.com
Sat Feb 1 01:35:06 UTC 2014


Point of fact: Leif never blocked his membership. Ron withdrew it.

Three people asked Leif why he said he'd block his membership; apparently
they disagreed with his "Ron is a troll" accusation and probably thought he
would be fine for membership.

I don't think Ron forgot it, but I can see why you are asking if he did:
it's a two year old accusation.

-Al


On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 5:03 PM, bfb <bfb at riseup.net> wrote:

> Omitting this information from discussion is classical "not on good
> faith". Ron, did you forget that Leif had blocked your membership?
>
> -Kevin
>
>
> -------- Original message --------
> From: Al Sweigart
> Date:01/30/2014 09:47 (GMT-08:00)
> To: Leif Ryge
> Cc: NoiseBridge Discuss
> Subject: Re: [Noisebridge-discuss] History of my member page on the wiki
>
> That was years ago, Leif. You're not exactly up on current events at
> Noisebridge. https://noisebridge.net/wiki/Meeting_Notes_2014_01_28
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 4:47 AM, Leif Ryge <leif at synthesize.us> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 07:53:01PM -0800, Ronald Cotoni wrote:
>> > I have no idea who changed it but my membership was never blocked.
>>  [...]
>>
>> Huh? How can you say your membership was never blocked? We had a
>> conversation
>> about why I wasn't comfortable with you being a member, which resulted in
>> you
>> withdrawing your membership application. I'm quite certain that you
>> interpreted
>> this conversation (as I did) as me blocking your membership, because at
>> least 3
>> other people asked me later why I'd blocked your membership.
>>
>> My primary reason for blocking your membership, as you'll recall, was
>> that I
>> believe your participation in Noisebridge meetings and discussions is
>> largely
>> disingenuous and "for the lulz" (read: you're a troll). Your claim above
>> that
>> your membership was "never blocked" after you'd specifically complained to
>> other people that it was is a good example of this assessment being
>> correct.
>>
>> ~leif
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
>> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
>> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/attachments/20140131/c0889081/attachment.html>


More information about the Noisebridge-discuss mailing list