[Noisebridge-discuss] Streaming Noisebridge meetings [help needed]
pnaomi at gmail.com
Thu Feb 6 19:42:43 UTC 2014
First, theory: what's said at meetings -- the words that come out of
people's mouths -- are not necessary what people would put in writing.
Yeah, we do a lot of shit through google, but this list is public and
search engine index-able (in case you didn't know). So I use my gmail
account for this list, because I consider it compromised already.
Browser viewing isn't the issue. I guess you could make an argument
that if you use Google Chrome you should probably be using it in
And then you could go a step further and say, hey, we should be piping
this meeting through a Tor node.
But: one step at a time, I say. And step 1 would be to NOT take the
step of starting to rely on yet another shady social service,
especially one with as poor a track record as Google's. (References
gladly provided upon request.)
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 10:47 AM, Romy Ilano <romy at snowyla.com> wrote:
> Oh, OK, so it's a Google/security issue. Now I understand!
> The intentions are honorable and now all the workaround is making a lot of
> Would televised meetings on the internet still be safe? I'm not arguing
> against the methods, but I'm viewing this discussion in a Google Chrome
> browser and my mail is google mail.
> Should people not view things in Google Chrome?
> Romy Ilano
> romy at snowyla.com
> On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Naomi Most <pnaomi at gmail.com> wrote:
>> No, the point is not to make up the most convoluted solution. The
>> point is not to use the "obvious cheap way" that results in
>> Noisebridge being even more frivolously dependent on a company in bed
>> with the NSA, whose terms of service guarantee neither security nor
>> privacy, and whose "real name" policies have resulted in the
>> disenfranchisement and disconnection of several of our members from
>> their data.
Naomi Theora Most
naomi at nthmost.com
More information about the Noisebridge-discuss