[Noisebridge-discuss] "Banning" discussion tonight
setient at gmail.com
Wed Feb 26 01:53:50 UTC 2014
Come to a meeting. Read the bylaws and look at the wiki. These questions
can be answered by those things
On Feb 25, 2014 5:47 PM, "Charles Tang" <cjtang1 at asu.edu> wrote:
> Is active member defined be the label "member" or is it define by those
> who are "active."
> Or is there really a mythical "active member"
> Sent from Mailbox <https://www.dropbox.com/mailbox> for iPhone
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 5:45 PM, Adrian Chadd <adrian.chadd at gmail.com>wrote:
>> On 25 February 2014 17:42, Darius Garza <313kid at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > "A ban from the Noisebridge space may be a useful social punishment for
>> > social crime"
>> > Noisebridge is a lot of things, but it certainly isn't up to anyone to
>> > it as a "social punishment" tool.
>> ... noisebridge is apparently whatever the active membership decide it
>> is. I thought that was the point.
>> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
>> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Noisebridge-discuss