[Noisebridge-discuss] Consensus item

Rachel McConnell rachel at xtreme.com
Wed Jan 1 23:51:16 UTC 2014


It was just a mis-placed hyphen.  I'm sure Al meant, "rat face-fucker" 
which I'm sure you agree is a superior insult to "pig fucker".

Rachel1.0

On 1/1/14 3:30 PM, gardner at invulnerable.org wrote:
> Danny,
>    I agree. I much prefer the derisive term "pig fucker" over "rat-face
> fucker." Are we not civilized?
>
> -g
>
> On 2014-01-01 13:54, Danny O'Brien wrote:
>> What was *that* all about?
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 8:33 PM, Al Sweigart <asweigart at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Gee, I hope the people at the meeting don't try some sneaky thing
>>> like take
>>> advantage of the fact that it is New Year's Eve and try to pass some
>>> consensus items they know members would block.
>>>
>>> But no one would do that, because only a rat-face fucker who doesn't
>>> truly
>>> care about the spirit of the consensus process would do that.
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
>>> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
>>> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
>> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
>> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss


More information about the Noisebridge-discuss mailing list