[Noisebridge-discuss] Linux study group hdwe?

hol at gaskill.com hol at gaskill.com
Wed Jul 2 21:10:07 UTC 2014


 

>DRAMAtize 

On 2014-07-02 09:05, maestro wrote: 

> bacon bits:
>> If people don't step forward to claim these things
> 
> Things that are clearly MARKED by functioning groups that meet @ NB don't need to be 'claimed' as it already states whose it is & what it's for. That's like saying "does anyone know who this suitcase that says joe blow 86 mission st., s.f., ca. 94109 415 867 5309 / fax 415 777 3456 belongs to?"
> 
> Thats what was requested in the first place was things to be marked which we have done LONG before any reboot ideas anyway since beings stole our stuff in the past.
> 
>> Pompous answers
> 
>> is not required or necessary
> 
> calling people names on the list and telling people what is 'required' or 'necessary' is most UNEXCELLENT.
> 
> YOU, are NOT in charge of NB nor anyone there stop trying to DRAMAtize a simple response to someones mail that wasnt from you or to you. there was nothing pompous in my communique nor was it to YOU merely cc'd to NB-disgust as to not privately sidemail her inbox which is proper list mail action.
> 
> Nicely asking someone to do an excellence and saying that would be 'kewl' so people dont have to come all the way down to the space just to move a tote is far from troll bait.
> 
> To house (NB): sigh
> we will come down and move the tote completely out of any electricians or inspectors way(which it wasnt in unless someone moved it) tomorrow (thur)...
> 
> IF, for some reason it is causing pain and misery before that day if someone will please just set it in Turing under a table or on top of the shelf we'll take it from there...
> 
> thanks...
> 
> Message ends
> _________________
 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/attachments/20140702/a1b34f69/attachment.html>


More information about the Noisebridge-discuss mailing list