[Noisebridge-discuss] on consensus
setient at gmail.com
Sat Mar 15 01:54:32 UTC 2014
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 4:33 PM, rachel lyra hospodar
<rachelyra at gmail.com>wrote:
> In a recent email,
> On 3/14/2014 2:17 PM, Al Sweigart wrote:
>> No one owes anyone compromise or explanation when they block an item.
> which is actually patently untrue and kind of an integral part of any
> consensus process - people willing to work with each other. I don't have a
> horse in the tom-jake argument, have seen them both be reasonable and
> not-reasonable at different times, and consider them both to be friends.
> I have been meaning to write some ranty polemics to the list about how
> consensus works, since many of us seem to be missing some key things.
> I just went off hiatus, kids. look out.
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Noisebridge-discuss