[Noisebridge-discuss] Do the Noisebridge House Rules really rule?
pnaomi at gmail.com
Mon Mar 24 23:58:29 UTC 2014
Wow. A Godwin's Law Number of 1.
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 3:34 PM, Dayton Grant <daytongrant68 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Fwd'd msg ---- wit acaveat
>> Sure you can send to your noisebridge peeps;
>> you don't need a license for this....but see below
>> First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out
>> -- Because I was not a Socialist.
>> Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak
>> out-- Because I was not a Trade Unionist.
>> Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out
>> -- Because I was not a Jew.
>> Then they came for me--and there was no one left to speak for me.
>> - Martin Niemöller
>> My take
>> First they came for the drug users and harassers of any type,
>> and I did not speak out-- Because I was never a drug user or
>> harasser of any type whatsoever.
>> Then they came for those sleeping at the Space and persons
>> who wouldn't clean up after themselves when using the kitchen,
>> and I did not speak out-- Because I never slept at the Space
>> or use the kitchen.
>> Then they came for those who wouldn't hack or learn to hack
>> in their narrow definition of the same, and I did not speak out
>> -- Because I always either hacked or learned to hack according
>> to their very definition of both of these.
>> Then they came for approved hackers such as myself who
>> refused to fully support their increasing policy hacks
>> --and there was no one left to speak for me.
>> - Moi
>> OMG do I really need to explain why you shouldn't DARE
>> use my real name or username??? Dude, GET
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
Naomi Theora Most
naomi at nthmost.com
More information about the Noisebridge-discuss