[Noisebridge-discuss] [Drama] Fwd: [Noisebridge-announce] Important Noisebridge Procedural Changes

Kevin bfb at riseup.net
Wed Mar 26 10:04:07 UTC 2014


On March 26, 2014 1:46:34 AM PDT, Madelynn Martiniere <mmartiniere at gmail.com> wrote:
> It is still my understanding that we followed the procedure we laid
> out 
> in our first Board meeting 
> (https://noisebridge.net/wiki/Board/Meeting_minutes_2014-03-12):
> 
> 1. As soon as the wording for the proposal had been finalized, it was 
> posted to Github.
> 2. There was some discussion, issues raised, and items amended. Some
> of 
> that discussion was on Github, and some of it happened to be on other 
> channels.
> 3. 4/5 members of the board were in favor, thus passing the proposal
> 4. The information was then promptly shared with the Noisebridge
> community
> 
> I do agree that further discussion on the topic of how long a proposal
> 
> should stay in discussion within the board is in order, given the 
> surprising expediency of this motion. This is a conversation that the 
> BoD is having internally.
> 
> > Naomi Most <mailto:naomi at nthmost.com>
> > March 26, 2014 1:31 AM
> > In other words: discussion happened between 80% of the board
> > membership, and 20% of the board membership was left in the dark
> until
> > roughly 9 hours ago.
> >
> > Good clarification.
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 1:26 AM, Madelynn Martiniere
> >
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss

We reject your perspective.  Your words have no meaning. They are mainly disinformation. 


More information about the Noisebridge-discuss mailing list