[Noisebridge-discuss] Noisebridge as "facility"
pnaomi at gmail.com
Fri May 2 18:22:59 UTC 2014
Can you unpack your statements a little? It's actually not clear which
"this" you are referring to when you say "this would destroy
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 8:11 AM, openfly
<openfly at xn--kgbed8a0h.xn--ngbc5azd> wrote:
> This would destroy noisebridge, and is in fact the mindset that has caused so many problems for you.
> I am not surprised you people are blind to this fact.
> On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 09:48:13AM -0700, Johny Radio wrote:
>> Naomi Most <pnaomi at gmail.com> wrote:
>> "Should we make people who don't make an effort to understand the
>> technology we are making available feel unwelcome, to avoid this kind
>> of drama?"
>> "Or should we embrace the idea of being a community facility, and
>> honestly seek to keep available the "services" (such as public
>> internet terminals) that some people have come to rely on?"
>> YES. As long as those people come to NB to learn, teach, hack, or make.
>> PS I thought the kitchen was intentionally sabotaged with the knowledge of everyone on this list, specifically to stop abuse of the space by non hackers. I'm fine with that.
>> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
>> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
Naomi Theora Most
naomi at nthmost.com
More information about the Noisebridge-discuss