[Noisebridge-discuss] Noisebridge as "facility"
pnaomi at gmail.com
Mon May 5 20:05:38 UTC 2014
I haven't been privy to this apparently private discussion, but I
would guess that openfly is arguing "hackerspace for hackers".
I think openfly believes that once you have a strong enough community
of Actual Hackers who care about the space and are there all the time,
"everything follows from that".
I believe this, too. But how to get there.
It certainly doesn't just happen, and it certainly doesn't happen when
there's a large contingent of Actual Hackers who refuse to come to the
space until it's all fixed up somehow, by someone else.
On Sun, May 4, 2014 at 4:49 PM, Johny Radio <johnyradio at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 5/2/2014 3:56:13 PM, "openfly" <openfly@إرهاب.شبكة> wrote:
>>>2 Narcotics Use, 2.a Meth ,.b Heroin ,2.c Marijuana ,2.d Mushrooms ,2.e
>>> DMT ,2.f Angel Dust ,2.g PCP ,3.a Theft ,,3.b Sexual Assault, 3.e Loitering
> fly, your list of problems is a description of noisebridge NOW.
> so you're arguing that NB should STOP providing open ACCESS to the general
> public, as it does now?
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
Naomi Theora Most
naomi at nthmost.com
More information about the Noisebridge-discuss