[Noisebridge-discuss] on allowing anonymous editing on the wiki
pnaomi at gmail.com
Tue May 20 16:13:42 UTC 2014
That was a totally separate discussion within Slack. It comes back to
the whole "I think you are not into organizational design" (or
something you said to me earlier).
See, Daravinne and I are similar in how we approach organizational
design, which is that -- especially in situations akin to Noisebridge
-- we deploy tentative solutions first and then wait for data.
Adjust, rework, deploy the next solution.
That's why the Wicked Problems article was interesting: because it
showed that someone else has defined problems like the ones
Noisebridge is full of, in terms that made intuitive sense to me.
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 1:09 AM, Johny Radio <johnyradio at gmail.com> wrote:
> From: "Naomi Gmail" <pnaomi at gmail.com>
>> No, thanks. The Wicked Problems article has very little to do with the
>> wiki stuff, so your framing seems suspect.
> then why did you recommend the Wicked Problems article to me?
Naomi Theora Most
naomi at nthmost.com
More information about the Noisebridge-discuss