[Noisebridge-discuss] Unfairly removed, banned without consensus, and given no warning

Naomi Most pnaomi at gmail.com
Mon Feb 23 22:27:42 UTC 2015


That's an excellent point, Spinach, and touches on something I've been
thinking about a lot recently -- Noisebridge absolutely should serve as a
hub for anti-gentrification activities.

The thing to keep in mind is that, while providing utilities, we have to
respect the intended purpose of Noisebridge and the community of
Noisebridge.

I don't think it's that hard for people to understand that you shouldn't
shit where you eat.  Slinging virtual mud around the hackerspace at the
same time you're trying to extract value out of it is a pretty poor
community strategy.

--Naomi


On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 2:19 PM, Spinach Williams <
spinach.williams at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> On Feb 23, 2015 11:37 AM, "Naomi Most" <pnaomi at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > OK, this has gone on long enough and is a waste of everyone's time.[snip]
> sounds p bad, also gon' echo kevin's sentiment that it's at least occasion
> to kick down scratch for the cost of printing. the continued well-being of
> the community is typically of some concern to a propagandist.
>



-- 
Naomi Theora Most
naomi at nthmost.com
+1-415-728-7490

skype: nthmost

http://twitter.com/nthmost
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/attachments/20150223/177398e5/attachment.html>


More information about the Noisebridge-discuss mailing list