[Noisebridge-discuss] Is Noisebridge Alive? How to tell!

Norman Bradley pryankster at gmail.com
Fri Jun 5 16:11:04 UTC 2015


Perhaps some type of IR sensors that turn on / off a sign on the first
floor? That nobody would be recognizable but people outside would know that
there are people inside to open the door. I'd just do it but I don't have
the knowledge needed to build it.

On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 8:41 AM, Ronald Cotoni <setient at gmail.com> wrote:

> So is that a "No" to a meeting that is public, adequately announced,
> planned but not the weekly meeting?  Like a working group but for a shorter
> term issue.
>
> On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 8:28 AM, kjs <bfb at riseup.net> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> jarrod hicks:
>> > However this works out. The camera should probably be off for now.
>> >
>> > https://noisebridge.net/wiki/Do-ocracy
>> >
>> > "If someone nicely asks you to change something back, be nice back and
>> > just change it back.
>> > If someone's being a dick to you about something you've changed, be
>> > nice and just change it back. If you must cry about it only do so
>> > after you've restored things."
>> >
>>
>> Exactly my feeling as well. Thank you Jarrod.
>>
>>
>> > On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 7:27 PM, Rubin Abdi <rubin at starset.net> wrote:
>> >> kjs wrote on 2015-06-04 19:17:
>> >>> I feel pointing a camera at the hackatorium requires discussion in a
>> >>> public forum. Pushing the conversation to a side channel undermines
>> >>> the concerns raised by others who don't want to meet with you
>> >>> individually. Until all concerns have been addressed, the camera
>> >>> should remain out of operation.
>> >>
>> >> Considering I've heard four separate people tell me how much of a shit
>> >> show the last two meetings have been because of how others have poorly
>> >> raised and discussed their concerns over this project, I have zero
>> >> interest in wasting my time or the community's time. However I am more
>> >> than happy to (and have been implored by others to) give you and anyone
>> >> else my direct full undivided attention individually in person in a
>> form
>> >> that isn't the mailing list nor the Tuesday meeting (and as it turns
>> >> out, already successfully have). Even though this isn't a consensus
>> >> item, dealing with problems outside of the Tuesday meeting is
>> >> classically how we've done it.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks.
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Rubin
>> >> rubin at starset.net
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
>> >> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
>> >> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>> >>
>> >
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
>> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
>> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Ronald Cotoni
> Systems Engineer
>
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>
>


-- 
You are entitled to your own opinion.
You are NOT entitled to your own facts.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/attachments/20150605/db48342c/attachment.html>


More information about the Noisebridge-discuss mailing list