[Noisebridge-discuss] Secheduling a Cryptography Talk at Noisebridge on 4 August
john.d.shutt at gmail.com
Tue Jul 26 16:54:31 UTC 2016
Thanks, Peter! I’ll add it to the calendar.
> On Jul 24, 2016, at 11:36 PM, Peter Schwabe <peter at cryptojedi.org> wrote:
> John Shutt <john.d.shutt at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Yep, a short abstract would be good. Thanks!
> Dear John, dear all,
> Sorry for the late response, how about this one:
> Title: Post-quantum crypto
> Abstract: In 2012, Mark Ketchen, researcher at IBM, stated about large
> quantum computers that they are "within reach" and estimated
> a timespan of 10 to 15 years until such computers can be
> built. It is not clear if Ketchen is right with this estimate,
> it is not even clear if a large quantum computer will ever be
> built. However, what is clear is that such a computer will be
> able to break all asymmetric cryptography in wide use today.
> More specifically, it will break in polynomial time systems
> that are based on factoring (like RSA) and systems based on
> the discrete logarithm (like DSA, and Diffie-Hellman key
> exchange), including their elliptic-curve variants.
> There are asymmetric cryptographic systems that, as far as we
> know, are not broken by quantum computers, so called
> "post-quantum cryptography". It is obvious that once large
> quantum computers exist, the world will need to switch to such
> post-quantum schemes. However, users who are concerned about
> long-term security, have to switch to post-quantum schemes for
> confidentiality already now: an attacker who records and
> stores key exchanges today can go back in a decade or two and
> use a quantum computer to attack them.
> In my talk I will give a brief overview of post-quantum crypto
> and then highlight what we can, and should, already do today
> to provide long-term security in cryptographic systems. In
> particular, I will present the "NewHope" key exchange, which
> is currently used in an experiment by Google and is one of the
> candidates to be considered for post-quantum key exchange in
More information about the Noisebridge-discuss