<p><a href="http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2010/07/daniel_ellsberg_interview">http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2010/07/daniel_ellsberg_interview</a></p>
<p>Bar... raised.</p>
<p><blockquote type="cite">On Aug 2, 2010 3:14 PM, &quot;Curly Wurly&quot; &lt;<a href="mailto:curlywurly22987@gmail.com">curlywurly22987@gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br><br><p><font color="#500050">On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 10:55 PM, Jake &lt;<a href="mailto:jake@spaz.org">jake@spaz.org</a>&gt; wrote:<br>
<br>&gt; <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/02/wo.">http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/02/wo.</a>..</font></p><a href="http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2010/07/29/128848467/fears-for-afghans-cited-in-wikileaks-leak" target="_blank">http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2010/07/29/128848467/fears-for-afghans-cited-in-wikileaks-leak</a>:<br>

<br>
&quot;Will one result of WikiLeaks&#39; unauthorized data dump of 90,000<br>
classified documents related to the Afghanistan War be reprisals<br>
against Afghans identified in the leaked material as helping NATO?&quot;<br>
<br>
I don&#39;t know how anyone involved with WikiLeaks can sleep at night<br>
knowing that their actions will likely result in someone&#39;s death.<br>
It&#39;s immoral and irresponsible.  Just because someone has the smarts<br>
to set up something like WikiLeaks doesn&#39;t mean they have the wisdom<br>
to think through the consequences.  This is something newspapers<br>
wrestle with though, so perhaps in the future those involved could<br>
simply ask the NY Times, LA Times, or Washington Post &quot;Would you<br>
publish this?&quot;<br>
<p><font color="#500050">_______________________________________________<br>Noisebridge-discuss mailing list<br>Noisebridge-discuss...</font></p></blockquote></p>