After consensus, we could have an election with 5 &quot;unopposed&quot; candidates to satisfy the by-laws.<br><br><div>John</div><div><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 3:41 PM, Albert Sweigart <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:asweigart@gmail.com">asweigart@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">Why don&#39;t we use consensus to determine who should be on the board of<br>
directors? Consensus has been working for our other decisions. What<br>
would be the downsides?<br>
<br>
-Al<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Noisebridge-discuss mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Noisebridge-discuss@lists.noisebridge.net">Noisebridge-discuss@lists.noisebridge.net</a><br>
<a href="https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss" target="_blank">https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>