<div dir="ltr">My simpleton opinion on this Bitcoin 2 talk is that it appears to damage what Bitcoin was meant to be, anonymous decentralised digital cash. Transaction reversals, etc are completely contrary to that. <br><br>IMO, why not Litecoin? It's already pretty well supported, ASIC resistant and doing well. And if not Litecoin, how about Feathercoin or some other already running scrypt coin that holds up to what the original Bitcoin was. <br><br>On Tuesday, July 23, 2013 8:30:04 AM UTC-7, Plato wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0;margin-left: 0.8ex;border-left: 1px #ccc solid;padding-left: 1ex;"><div dir="ltr">Hello guys, this is quite interesting, I found it on scribd and uploaded it to Reddit but did not author the paper.<div><br></div><div>Whitepaper:</div><div><a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/155504772/Bitcoin-2-Freedom-of-Transaction" target="_blank">http://www.scribd.com/doc/<wbr>155504772/Bitcoin-2-Freedom-<wbr>of-Transaction</a><br>
</div><div>Reddit thread:</div><div><a href="http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1ivzn1/whitepaper_bitcoin_2_would_increase_network/" target="_blank">http://www.reddit.com/r/<wbr>Bitcoin/comments/1ivzn1/<wbr>whitepaper_bitcoin_2_would_<wbr>increase_network/</a><br clear="all">
<div><br></div>-- <br>-plato<br><br>(\/) (°m°) (\/) <br>Woop woop woop woop woop!