[Rack] Vandalizing continues
pnaomi at gmail.com
Fri May 9 18:09:47 UTC 2014
Here's an idea that teratoma (Dan H) came up with: allow anonymous
edits only from within Noisebridge.
How do we feel about that?
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 11:00 AM, Jeffrey Carl Faden
<jeffreyatw at gmail.com> wrote:
> I tried deleting certain edits in your page's edit history but I couldn't
> find any option to do so. I blocked another IP that vandalized your user
> discussion page just a few moments ago.
> On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Johny Radio <johnyradio at gmail.com> wrote:
>> sorry to keep bugging you rack, but some loser is continuing to vandalize
>> my wiki posts. I've repeatedly asked Rack to block anonymous edits on Events
>> and been refused.
>> -i'm organizing an event to receive a donated CNC mill. The event-listing
>> was vandalized. Inventables.com is donating equipment worth over $500 to
>> noisebridge, and this loser is shitting on it. The people who admin the wiki
>> refuse to stop the vandalizing.
>> -i'm organizing a noisebridge fundraiser. the event listing was
>> -i have repeatedly removed the junk edits, and the vandal keeps
>> re-vandalizing. This is one persistent loser.
>> -i moved my userpage to a new page in an effort to avoid them, so now
>> they're just linking to their vandalized versions on my new userpage.
>> Can someone please explain how giving a free pass to vandals supports
>> noisebridge ideals, as Jeffrey Carl stated. which noisebridge principle says
>> we must give a free pass to vandals? how exactly does that support
>> if you're unwilling to block anonymous edits to the events page, then at
>> least please delete the history of my userpage to get rid of the vandalized
>> Rack mailing list
>> Rack at lists.noisebridge.net
> Rack mailing list
> Rack at lists.noisebridge.net
Naomi Theora Most
naomi at nthmost.com
More information about the Rack