[Space] cool video

Blake Barrett Blake at BlakeBarrett.net
Wed Jun 9 11:14:38 PDT 2010


I agree. Also, wind patterns are different at night, it might not end up
where we expect.
Just something else to consider.

On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Jonathan Moore <moore at eds.org> wrote:

> On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 11:04 PM, Bryan Klofas <bklofas at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Speaking of landing in a perfect place, since the winds won't shift much
> > from last launch to Friday, maybe we can launch from somewhere near the
> > intersection of 92 and 280, down the peninsula? It's out of the flight
> paths
> > of the airports, and will drop us near the town of Patterson, in the
> central
> > valley. The only problem is if it's a little short (or bursts early), it
> > will be difficult to recover.
> >
> > We might want to even launch farther east, as being closer to Turlock
> would
> > make recovery even easier. Attached is a prediction....
>
> I really think launching west of the bay is a bad idea. If things go
> wrong you could end up in flight paths for two or three deferent high
> traffic airports, and there is the hole landing in they bay thing to
> consider.
>
> -Jonathan
> _______________________________________________
> Space mailing list
> Space at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/space
>



-- 
Blake
blake at blakebarrett.net
1 559 455 7855
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.noisebridge.net/pipermail/space/attachments/20100609/315abaae/attachment.htm 


More information about the Space mailing list