Meeting Notes 2014 06 03

From Noisebridge
Jump to: navigation, search

You should read the meeting instructions forthwith!
Don't forget to post the meeting notes to the wiki and e-mail the discussion list with a short summary.

These are the notes from the The 316th Meeting of Noisebridge. Note-taker: Kevin ; Moderator: Jarrod

  • Consensed github repository as true source of consensus history
  • 3 Member apps were proxy blocked and tabled for further discussion offline
  • Refactoring Noisebridge access policy was discussed

Short announcements and events[edit]

  • Firmware needs upgrading
  • Want to have a Noisebridge caravan to Toorcamp, contact Kevin <bfb at riseup dot net>
  • Matt wants to talk shop on Android
  • Joe wants to teach silk screening at Noisebridge.

Membership Binder [edit]

  • John E w4 - elects to wait until next week
  • John S w3
  • Sven w1
  • Alan w2

Cory w4 consensus discussion[edit]

I enjoy the openness of Noisebridge. Spend a good bit of time here. Want to put my money where my mouth is. I bring conflict mediation skills and prior experience in the non-profit world.
What's a hackerspace? This
How can we improve Noisebridge? Throw my hat in for Secretary.
When do you see yourself blocking? I would sooner walk away than block.
Who sent you? Who are you working for? I have my motivations. I want to learn Unix and such.
Do you think it is fair to say that as a general guideline that banning due to personality clashes is appropriate? No.
Monad proxy blocks. Will discuss in person or private with Cory further.

TABLED for further discussion[edit]

Deja w4 consensus discussion[edit]


Monad proxy blocks. Will discuss in person or private with Deja further.

TABLED for further discussion[edit]

Sid w4 consensus discussion[edit]


Monad proxy blocks. Will discuss in person or private with Sid further.

TABLED for further discussion[edit]

Financial Report[edit]

Consensus items[edit]

Proposals from last week [edit]

(Add any items which pass or are blocked to the Consensus Items History page.)

Affirm repository as accurate Noisebridge consensus[edit]

After minor edits to the pull request, consensus was reached.

Consensed[edit]

Access policy Week 1[edit]

Noisebridge should be as open as possible.

I like the simple wording.
More accurately reflects reality.
Language could use some more umph. Perhaps a stronger statement of values...
Suggested change "Noisebridge is open, when it is not closed"
Excellence remains over arching norm.
Author is open to updating the language, more discussion, a working group, invites anybody to modify the wiki.

Will return next week[edit]

Proposals for next week [edit]

(Add any new items for consensus to the Current Consensus Items page.)

Discussion Notes[edit]

Attendance[edit]

  • Alan
  • Jarrod -Moderator
  • Sid
  • Jade
  • J
  • Matt
  • Dan
  • Cory
  • Daravinne
  • Kevin
  • Casey
  • Alma
  • Mike
  • John
  • Amanda
  • Chuck
  • Joe
  • Eve

Now that the meeting is over, don't forget to post the meeting notes to the wiki and e-mail the discussion list with a short summary.