DreamworksReply: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
262 bytes added ,  28 January 2013
no edit summary
(grammar)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
(Hello people from the Internet. Just a note that this is only a draft of a proposed letter. Noisebridge decides this kind of thing by consensus at our Tuesday meetings. We'll revisit whether to edit or send this in its current form on Tuesday 8PM January 29th.)
Dear Ashley and Todd,
Dear Ashley and Todd,


Line 5: Line 7:
and Daniel Domscheit-Berg. It must be very exciting to work on such a large
and Daniel Domscheit-Berg. It must be very exciting to work on such a large
project, especially when you need, as your letter says, clearance on our logo
project, especially when you need, as your letter says, clearance on our logo
"tomorrow" (15th January). How many people you must have to constantly ask for
"tomorrow" (15th January). How annoying it must be to constantly ask for
such permission, just for a little bit of set dressing!
such permissions, just for a little bit of set dressing!


It is probably long past the point where you were going to use it anyway, but
It is probably long past the point when you needed it, but
here is our reply:
here is our decision:


From your description, it should be clear to anyone watching your
From your description, it should be clear to anyone watching your
Line 29: Line 31:


Such a position is lunacy and a genuine threat to free speech and the first
Such a position is lunacy and a genuine threat to free speech and the first
amendment. You should use exercise all of your fair use rights freely, without
amendment. You should use exercise all of your fair use rights freely and without
fear.  
fear.  


So we say tell your friends at DreamWorks to publish (or print, or produce) and
So we say tell your friends at DreamWorks to publish (or print, or produce) and
be damned. Tell them we fully support them in their brave stand. You can say
be damned. Tell them we fully support them in their brave stand. You can say
with confidence that the only conditions in which Noisebridge would sue them and their
with confidence that the only conditions under which Noisebridge would sue them and their
partners to the maximum damages entitled to us by law would be if it turned out
partners to the maximum damages entitled to us by law would be if it turned out
that hackers like us were completely hypocritical nihilists, out only for our
that hackers like us were completely hypocritical nihilists out only for our
own egotistical ends.  
own egotistical ends.  


Given that you were so nice as to ask us, we can't
Given that you were so nice as to ask us, we can't imagine you think that of us.
imagine you think that of us.


Lots of love,
Lots of love,
Line 46: Line 47:
Noisebridge
Noisebridge


* - which frankly sounds a bit sleezy. Are you really inserting a fake subplot about a non-existent American spy in Iran who is exposed in the State department cables? Doesn't that seem a little irresponsible to you, given the great, real stories in the WikiLeaks affair you could have written about?
* - which frankly sounds a bit sleezy. Are the screenwriters really inserting a fake subplot about a non-existent American spy in Iran who is exposed in the State department cables? Doesn't that seem a little irresponsible to you, given the great, real stories in the WikiLeaks affair you could have written about?




Navigation menu